Incompetent Attorney - Guardian Ad Litem
Attorney Mary Gagne O'Donal of law firm Heller,Heller & McCoy Uncasville, Ct.
WARNING: DO NOT HIRE or USE
This attorney creates "Implacable Hostilities" in children against fathers on behalf of mothers.
WARNING: DO NOT HIRE or USE
This attorney creates "Implacable Hostilities" in children against fathers on behalf of mothers.
Mary Gagne O'Donal
Reference Case Docket No. # KNO-FA03-0126634-S Connecticut Superior Court
at Norwich Court House
Dated: June 6th, 2006 Court File Download - "CLICK HERE"
Presiding Judge: Honorable Cynthia J. Swienton
OVERVIEW of Case:
In accordance with the rules of the Connecticut Practice-book, attorneys appointed as Guardian Ad Litems (GAL)/ attorney for the Minor Children (AMC) under law are given "judicial immunity" from legal malpractice lawsuits to which they may handle with gross misconduct and willful neglect of the child clients they serve.
It is with honorable mention of the exclusive work and dedication of Connecticut Senator Mary Handley D-Manchester for her work and tireless hours to submit house bills requiring lawful accounting from these GAL's or AMC's as they represent children as a client. It is the primary case docket listed above, among others that prompted Senator Handley to pursue these legislative changes for the benefit of the children. For such attorneys acting as GAL/AMC accompanied with the judicial immunity, a parent litigator is prohibited from filing a legal malpractice lawsuit against such appointed attorney in order to hold them accountable for devious behavior and just plain old careless negligence, and/or failure to pursue actions or complaints in good faith.
While in some instances judicial immunity protects attorney GAL's/AMC's as a whole class, the protection afforded thereof gives the attorney a "Lack of Incentive" to perform vigorously for the "best interest of the child" giving the attorney a false sense of security and low responsibility and accounting for the work performed. Senator Handley seeks to remove this viable judicial protection and establish mandatory training requirements for GALs/AMCs to bring the quality of service for children up to a whole new standard. We applaud her in this area of intended law changes.
While the author was prevented from bringing a legal malpractice action due to "judicial immunity", publishing the intended changes to current law and publishing the devious acts of GAL Attorney Mary Gagne O'Donal and showing the subsequent low-ball performance in court certified transcripts, the downloadable transcripts will show how much of a POOR PERFORMER this attorney was in the course of representing her child clients.
at Norwich Court House
Dated: June 6th, 2006 Court File Download - "CLICK HERE"
Presiding Judge: Honorable Cynthia J. Swienton
OVERVIEW of Case:
In accordance with the rules of the Connecticut Practice-book, attorneys appointed as Guardian Ad Litems (GAL)/ attorney for the Minor Children (AMC) under law are given "judicial immunity" from legal malpractice lawsuits to which they may handle with gross misconduct and willful neglect of the child clients they serve.
It is with honorable mention of the exclusive work and dedication of Connecticut Senator Mary Handley D-Manchester for her work and tireless hours to submit house bills requiring lawful accounting from these GAL's or AMC's as they represent children as a client. It is the primary case docket listed above, among others that prompted Senator Handley to pursue these legislative changes for the benefit of the children. For such attorneys acting as GAL/AMC accompanied with the judicial immunity, a parent litigator is prohibited from filing a legal malpractice lawsuit against such appointed attorney in order to hold them accountable for devious behavior and just plain old careless negligence, and/or failure to pursue actions or complaints in good faith.
While in some instances judicial immunity protects attorney GAL's/AMC's as a whole class, the protection afforded thereof gives the attorney a "Lack of Incentive" to perform vigorously for the "best interest of the child" giving the attorney a false sense of security and low responsibility and accounting for the work performed. Senator Handley seeks to remove this viable judicial protection and establish mandatory training requirements for GALs/AMCs to bring the quality of service for children up to a whole new standard. We applaud her in this area of intended law changes.
While the author was prevented from bringing a legal malpractice action due to "judicial immunity", publishing the intended changes to current law and publishing the devious acts of GAL Attorney Mary Gagne O'Donal and showing the subsequent low-ball performance in court certified transcripts, the downloadable transcripts will show how much of a POOR PERFORMER this attorney was in the course of representing her child clients.